Skin Horse

By Shaenon K. Garrity & Jeffrey C. Wells
By Shaenon K. Garrity & Jeffrey C. Wells
Color by Pancha Diaz
  • About Us
  • Cast
  • Store
  • Extras
  • Original Art for Sale
  • Our Patreon
RSS
2019-01-10
‹‹ First ‹ Prev Buy! Comments(49) Next › Last ››

2019-01-10

by shaenon on January 10, 2019 at 12:01 am
Chapter: The Iron Man
Comments RSS

Discussion (49) ¬

  1. Towering Barbarian
    January 10, 2019, 12:03 am | # | Reply

    Tea Time is Serious Business! ^_^

    • Person5
      January 10, 2019, 9:41 am | # | Reply

      beesness*

  2. awgiedawgie
    January 10, 2019, 12:05 am | # | Reply

    Indeed! It must have been ages since she’s had any tea!

  3. Jerry Aethers
    January 10, 2019, 12:09 am | # | Reply

    “Your just pretending to be people, aren’t you?”

    That line is going to stick in my head for a while

    • Moe Lane
      January 10, 2019, 12:15 am | # | Reply

      But really: aren’t we all?

      • K. Iceclaw
        January 10, 2019, 12:15 pm | # | Reply

        I know THAT feeling…

    • casimir
      January 10, 2019, 1:12 am | # | Reply

      Given Tip’s apiphobia, his confrontational attitude strikes me as very brave…or foolhardy, considering the proximity of his bare shoulders.

      • awgiedawgie
        January 10, 2019, 1:30 am | # | Reply

        Perhaps his rational thinking is overpowering his fear. Deep down, he knows she isn’t going to hurt him, and he wants to know more.

        • harryvoyager
          January 10, 2019, 9:57 pm | # | Reply

          Either that or his curiosity overpowered his sense of self-preservation…

  4. WuseMajor
    January 10, 2019, 12:11 am | # | Reply

    Tip! That was very humanocentric. Just because someone isn’t a human or a product of human science doesn’t mean they’re not a person. Earth-native entity might be a more proper term to use here.

    • Urlance Woolsbane
      January 10, 2019, 12:23 am | # | Reply

      I don’t think it is anthrocentric, though. Gavotte’s a collective, which means she isn’t an individual, which is what I feel Tip is getting at.

    • Paul The Grey
      January 10, 2019, 12:39 am | # | Reply

      I’m interpreting Tip’s usage of “people” as roughly meaning “comparable and recognizeable to human-like minds”, with the implication that she isn’t remotely like us “under the hood” and her personality is a performance by something…else. Not necessarily lesser or hostile, but very alien.

      • darkstarling
        January 10, 2019, 3:08 am | # | Reply

        That’s how I took it too. The same way Helen Narbon, or any really far gone Mad scientist, is just pretending to be people. They’re an alien intellect that happens to include a human emulator.

      • Author X
        January 10, 2019, 11:27 am | # | Reply

        That’s how I took his meaning as well… but just because you mean a sentence one way, doesn’t make it less rude when it means something else.

      • Mister Steel
        August 2, 2020, 3:29 pm | # | Reply

        Paul the Grey, “Her personality is a performance”
        Correct, she is Gavotte, quite literally, a dance.

    • Ogden Wernstrom
      January 10, 2019, 12:57 am | # | Reply

      Yeah, it’s not what I expected, since so far just about everything sentient was pretty much a person regardless of origin, not like other settings with their incomprehensible minds or paperclip optimizer values. Speaking of which, civilization survived the invention of the computer, but smartphones are pure evil. They even designed the little hole that you insert a tool into to release the SIM tray had to be made just a little bit too narrow to admit a paperclip, presumably as a clear statement of war against all that is good and holy. If there’s an alien mind at the heart of global commerce, then one must assume it takes the notion of paperclip optimizers quite literally and has taken preemptive steps like Damien of the later Omen sequels trying to prevent the second coming of Jesus.

    • emusam
      January 10, 2019, 5:23 pm | # | Reply

      Given that it is Tip and Gavotte’s job (was their job? I’ve lost track) to assign or deny personhood to non-humans, I think there can be a lot of unknown background conversations on the matter (mostly but not entirely about the bureaucracy). In context, this has a very specific meaning which is not limited to the definition here: http://skin-horse.com/comic/will-be-provided/

    • Kanta
      January 10, 2019, 9:13 pm | # | Reply

      “Person,” does have specific meanings in certain contexts that are not, “Human,” and only has a coincidental, if large, overlap with, “Human.” It is plausible to find a human that is not a person. It is plausible to find a person who is not in any way related to humans. It’s possible Gavotte is neither human (which we knew already) nor a person (which would be the surprising part), and that may be what Tip’s getting at.

  5. Robert Nowall
    January 10, 2019, 12:41 am | # | Reply

    It’s four?

    • awgiedawgie
      January 10, 2019, 1:27 am | # | Reply

      When you’ve been through what she has – without any tea – any time can be tea time.

      • dornbeast
        January 10, 2019, 2:04 am | # | Reply

        If you’re British enough, tea time is when there’s tea to be had.

        I remember hearing that this nearly put Aliens over its production time.

    • mickeyjf
      January 10, 2019, 6:49 pm | # | Reply

      She’s got nasty habits…

      • awgiedawgie
        January 10, 2019, 10:57 pm | # | Reply

        Speak for yourself. I happen to enjoy a cup of tea.

  6. GammarayCanon
    January 10, 2019, 12:53 am | # | Reply

    This is interesting. Eusocial insects aren’t anything like the hive minds people always portray them as, and are quite literally just a bunch of individuals working together because very similar things benefit them. So maybe Gavotte is just the persona a bunch of individually sapient bees are working together to play, rather than an emergent mind.

    • awgiedawgie
      January 10, 2019, 1:48 am | # | Reply

      But is she a group of eusocial insects? Or is that just what she wants you to think?

    • darkstarling
      January 10, 2019, 3:06 am | # | Reply

      What’s the difference between that and the emergent mind that is a government, or a corporation? Serious question. I don’t think there is much of one.

      • darkstarling
        January 10, 2019, 3:09 am | # | Reply

        Especially since, really, when you look at how human brains work? We’re no so much one singular entity as a collection of loosely coordinated independent subsystems. A person is what emerges from that interaction.

      • Urlance Woolsbane
        January 10, 2019, 5:54 am | # | Reply

        There’s more conscious design at work in human endeavors, but I think the extent of that is generally overestimated. It’s not just entities that behave this way, but belief systems as well, be they religions or political ideologies or what-have-you.

      • Hannibal's Lectern
        January 10, 2019, 1:47 pm | # | Reply

        And, as we all know, corporations are people, my friend…

    • Bruce A Munro
      January 10, 2019, 10:58 am | # | Reply

      Social insects aren’t a “hive mind” a la Borg, but they aren’t exactly freely associating individuals, either: they’ve evolved into something else https://www.amazon.com/Superorganism-Beauty-Elegance-Strangeness-Societies/dp/0393067041

      • Nix
        January 11, 2019, 6:02 am | # | Reply

        Seconded. Social insect colonies are not just random cooperating individuals: their hive behaviours are largely implemented via distributed algorithms crossing across large numbers of individuals. This only works because those individuals share those algorithms: i.e., they are genetically similar organisms and it is evolutionarily stable for this result to occur (i.e., doing so will spread the genes of those doing it). Since social insect individuals are mostly sterile, this implies that this only works because most of the time those executing the algorithms have close relatives in the hive that they are benefiting by doing so.

        Otherwise it would be beneficial for nonreproductive workers to cheat and reproduce on their own rather than trusting to someone else to do it who might not be a relative, or who might be distantly-enough related that their genes would spread more if they reproduced themselves (some social insects do just that in conditions of strress: heck, some do so in conditions *not* of stress, and are hunted down by subcastes that kill such cheaters, because cheating degrades the overall effectiveness of the hive, i.e. of all the cheater’s sisters).

        (Of course, they have no idea that they are doing this, or indeed that the algorithms exist: it’s just that if this were not so, the result would not be evolutionarily stable, and eusocial insects would not exist. They just do what they do because it is what they do, and success results. Self-awareness is overrated. Gavotte is self-aware as
        a collective and it is strongly suggested that she has control over her individual members as well. This is *very* different from actual hives. Gavotte is not a social insect colony. Gavotte is… something else. Something strange.)

        If you want a colony of cooperating, independently-reproducing individuals, look at a wasp nest. (This was probably the prototype for true eusocial insects other than termites, since bees and ants evolved from wasps.)

    • BRGR
      January 12, 2019, 4:20 am | # | Reply

      Bee hives are very much hive minds.
      I think the confusion is because people don’t understand the concept.

      Individual bees don’t decide to co-operate because it benefits them. They co-operate because they are genetically unable not to. There is no conscious effort involved.

      The emergent behaviour of a bee hive is very different from the behaviour of individual bees. (And the hive very much acts like an individual, much like humans act as individuals despite their many different (and very often antagonistic to each other) individual neurons and glands. Most obviously: Bees are social; hives are not.)

      Most people seem to think that a hive mind means that every individual thinks the same things. That is just nonsense. If every constituent individual thought the same, every individual would act the same. Imagine an orchestra where everyone played the same line on the same instrument.

  7. David B Huber
    January 10, 2019, 2:22 am | # | Reply

    Gavotte: the Being formerly known as “Poppins”! 😉

    • ruggs
      January 10, 2019, 9:07 am | # | Reply

      I love it. XD

  8. notactuallyaperson
    January 10, 2019, 8:41 am | # | Reply

    MAKE THEM SUPPER
    ALIEN BEES!

    • Random Memestealer
      January 10, 2019, 4:19 pm | # | Reply

      STAND BACK I’LL SHOW YOU HOW IT’S DONE.
      OVER THE PROVERBIAL RIDGE.

  9. Mental Mouse
    January 10, 2019, 9:41 am | # | Reply

    darkstarling: The difference is that the beehive was evolved and fine-tuned over millions of generations to be a functional and self-propagating collective entity.

    Governments and corporations are recent extensions of our own tribal and family dynamics, which are themselves a little rough around the edges by evolutionary standards. They are evolving faster because they’re now operating on a memetic as much as a genetic level, but even so they just haven’t had enough generations to work out a lot of the kinks in their collective behavior.

    Or even for them to back-adapt from “makes a lot of profit” (recently a must-have survival trait) to “provides a living for its component workers” (a long-term survival trait, recently overshadowed but still matters).

  10. Robert Nowall
    January 10, 2019, 10:26 am | # | Reply

    Tip’s being awfully humanocentric, isn’t he? Who says people have to be either human or created by humans?

    • Khno
      January 10, 2019, 5:05 pm | # | Reply

      definition A4537Zcl4-vx of the shadow psychologist manual

  11. Bruce A Munro
    January 10, 2019, 10:55 am | # | Reply

    Well, she _did_ tell Dr. Lee earlier that bees are from outer space, but I’m not sure how much we’re supposed to trust her claims. (What, after all, did the pollinating before bees arrived from Lovetron?)

    • awgiedawgie
      January 10, 2019, 11:02 am | # | Reply

      Maybe butterflies did it all before. And then the bees made a deal with them. But then we don’t know exactly when the bees arrived, either.

    • awgiedawgie
      January 10, 2019, 11:06 am | # | Reply

      There’s also my earlier theory that Lovetron is not actually a different planet, but merely a remote location on Earth – so remote that they think of it as a different planet. Perhaps a tropical island that now hosts a Mad Scientist’s home?

      • Nix
        January 11, 2019, 6:04 am | # | Reply

        Lovetron is an odd name, really, given how bees reproduce, the males dying right after reproduction and nearly every individual member of the species knowing only the love of siblings. 🙂

    • W.
      January 10, 2019, 11:11 am | # | Reply

      Well, if you go far enough back in time, there were NO flowering plants. Many of our plants today are wind pollinated. It may just imply how long Gavotte has been around.

      • Robert Nowall
        January 10, 2019, 3:40 pm | # | Reply

        “I’ve been around forever…and I wrote the very first song…”

      • Bruce A Munro
        January 10, 2019, 4:55 pm | # | Reply

        If that’s the case, as I said earlier, it’s not going to be good for the ecosystem when they depart. Ah well, I guess the Mads can fill in with robo-bees [1] or something. (And then Dr. Lee can reverse-engineer them so people can build versions that _won’t_ try to destroy humanity).

        [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myOTp1wr3Bg

        • awgiedawgie
          January 10, 2019, 11:00 pm | # | Reply

          I figure when they depart, it’ll mean that the world was doomed anyway, so it really won’t much matter what happens to the ecosystem after that.

    • ranthalling
      January 10, 2019, 5:13 pm | # | Reply

      Historically? 50 million years before bees and other flying insects – the first pollinators were beetles. There are still many pollinating beetles – and more recently ants – that pollinate many species of plants. More recently, bats have been shown to provide pollination to some species of flowering plants. Here’s one article, mentioning beetles & ants.
      https://www.thoughtco.com/insect-pollinators-that-arent-bees-or-butterflies-1967996

  12. ruggs
    January 28, 2019, 12:59 pm | # | Reply

    Gavotte’s pre-planning as references the giant robot: http://skin-horse.com/comic/fewer-people/

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

More by Jeff

  • The Scrivnarium

More by Shaenon

  • Horror Every Day
  • Li'l Mell
  • Monster of the Week
  • Narbonic
  • Shaenon.com
Creative Commons License
Skin Horse by Shaenon K. Garrity & Jeffrey C. Wells is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at http://www.skin-horse.com.

©2007-2022 Skin Horse | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑