Skin Horse

By Shaenon K. Garrity & Jeffrey C. Wells
By Shaenon K. Garrity & Jeffrey C. Wells
Color by Pancha Diaz
  • About Us
  • Cast
  • Store
  • Extras
  • Original Art for Sale
  • Our Patreon
RSS
2018-12-07
‹‹ First ‹ Prev Buy! Comments(33) Next › Last ››

2018-12-07

by shaenon on December 7, 2018 at 12:01 am
Chapter: The Iron Man
Comments RSS

Discussion (33) ¬

  1. Robert Nowall
    December 7, 2018, 12:01 am | # | Reply

    Good thing they’ve got fusion pie, then.

  2. Rex Vivat
    December 7, 2018, 12:05 am | # | Reply

    About time Gavotte’s prediction came true.

  3. Bruce A Munro
    December 7, 2018, 12:29 am | # | Reply

    Eclectic mad scientists are always the most dangerous.

    • awgiedawgie
      December 7, 2018, 11:09 am | # | Reply

      Umm… isn’t that kind of redundant? Aren’t they all sort of eclectic?

      • Bruce A Munro
        December 7, 2018, 8:16 pm | # | Reply

        Are you confusing “eccentric” and “eclectic?” You can’t be eclectic if you have a single, limiting theme to all your work.

        • awgiedawgie
          December 7, 2018, 11:46 pm | # | Reply

          No, “eclectic” is sort of the defining quality of a Mad scientist. The ability – tendency, even – to take elements from several different sources, put them together in an entirely unnatural, or at least unexpected, fashion, and create something bigger that should not logically exist. This example springs readily to mind.

          Tigerlily has to overcome her affinity for spring-power, and embrace the limitless power supply available to her. There are more things in heaven and earth, Tigerlily, than are dreamt of in your spring-powered philosophy.

          • Rex Vivat
            December 8, 2018, 9:58 pm | #

            That’s something that bugs me a lot in these comics: some people are way too eager to conflate Mad Geniuses from Narbonic/Skin Horse with Sparks from Girl Genius. Just because they both have tendencies towards insanity and inventing doesn’t mean that they’re equivalent; they have their defining traits that are specific to their setting and don’t necessarily share them with people from other settings.
            TL;DR: Your example is invalid because it’s from a different setting.
            Tigerlily has indeed been narrow and dogmatic (both antonyms to eclectic, by the way) by rigidly insisting on using only spring power, and indeed, even requiring others to stick to her narrow doctrine. That’s the very opposite from being eclectic.

          • Rex Vivat
            December 8, 2018, 9:59 pm | #

            * in these comments, not comics.

          • awgiedawgie
            December 8, 2018, 11:46 pm | #

            Oh, I’m so sorry to have tweaked your pet peeve. Would you be satisfied with an example from this universe? Like Helen herself? Sure, she has an affinity for gerbils, but she is by no means above using anything – or everything – at her disposal. The story of the day she broke through is a prime example.

            Tigerlily is the exception, not the rule. And she needs to overcome her own limitations.

          • Rex Vivat
            December 9, 2018, 12:22 am | #

            But that’s just it, Tigerlily being an exception makes it not a rule. Helen being eclectic doesn’t prove that they all are, and Tigerlily not being eclectic actually proves that wrong; see, there’s a middle ground between “all Mad Geniuses are eclectic” and “there are no eclectic Mad Geniuses”. Eclecticism is a defining feature of Sparks in Girl Genius, but is not necessarily one here for Hypercognitive Dementia a.k.a Walton’s Disorder a.k.a Mad Genius.

          • awgiedawgie
            December 9, 2018, 12:26 am | #

            I should add that I used Agatha as an example not because I think that the Mad scientists in the Narboniverse are the exact same thing as the Sparks in the GG-verse, but because I just love the way she describes the madness that drives them.

        • awhyzip
          December 11, 2018, 7:12 pm | # | Reply

          Thank you, Rex Vivat — it needed to be said.
          Nothing wrong with comparing to a different work, but I too have been bothered by how many posters seem to be *conflating* the two worlds (Narboniverse and Girl Genius). That seems disrespectful to the authors.

          (Based on Awgiedawgie’s clarification, this case did skirt just inside the line, but I am glad you spoke up.)

          • awhyzip
            December 11, 2018, 7:14 pm | #

            And thank you awgiedawgie, for clarifying that you used Agatha only as a well-worded example, not as an in-universe “proof text”.

  4. Owlmirror
    December 7, 2018, 2:01 am | # | Reply

    Actually . . .

    St. Charlie was powered by a fusion device. The whole damn bigger-on-the-inside thing.

    St. Charlie traded that fusion device for a Brains!Unity-designed perpetual motion machine. It had to have worked because otherwise, the power would have stayed off after they made the trade.

    So a perpetual motion machine provides at least the same power output as a fusion device.

    Therefore, they could get by with three(or fewer?) perpetual motion machines.

    QED.

    (It would be ironic if the perpetual motion machine worked by springs.)

  5. Otakubouzu
    December 7, 2018, 3:32 am | # | Reply

    Well, minion.
    Can’t always grasp the important things about the mad scientist creation.

  6. casimir
    December 7, 2018, 4:25 am | # | Reply

    Don’t you just hate misremembering someone’s name and they don’t say anything and you keep calling them by the wrong name until you remember their name and correct yourself and still no one says anything, but in your mind your thinking, “God, I am such an idiot!”

    • casimir
      December 7, 2018, 4:31 am | # | Reply

      …and then you say “your” when you should have said “you’re”.

    • Rex Vivat
      December 7, 2018, 4:34 am | # | Reply

      You’d probably feel better if you could correct it retroactively, like she just did. Mad geniuses, man.

      • casimir
        December 7, 2018, 10:04 am | # | Reply

        Mad genius means never having to say you’re sorry.

    • Frank
      December 7, 2018, 6:56 am | # | Reply

      Isn’t “mama foxfire” the name she entered Tigerlily’s contest with?

      • Owlmirror
        December 7, 2018, 7:41 am | # | Reply

        Dave never smoked.

      • Rex Vivat
        December 7, 2018, 9:02 am | # | Reply

        That’s just it, it was “Mama Jupiter” before it got changed.

      • s854
        December 7, 2018, 10:38 am | # | Reply

        No, it was “Mamma Foxfire”, as Owlmirror said yesterday. I suppose they sound pretty similar when you say them.

        • awgiedawgie
          December 7, 2018, 11:13 am | # | Reply

          Go back and read Jeff’s comment yesterday. His original notes had Jupiter and it got changed to Foxfire.

      • Owlmirror
        December 7, 2018, 1:02 pm | # | Reply

        You can see today’s strip as it looked originally, here. Same principle applies to yesterday’s strip (take the image name, and remove “-1” from just before “.png”

        PS: Dave never smoked.

  7. Leslie Piper
    December 7, 2018, 6:30 am | # | Reply

    I have noticed that normals seem to respond quite well even when my apologies are quite late and often delivered by unexpected means. This is to say obviously that I am surrounded by caring people. And that I goof up a lot.

    • awgiedawgie
      December 7, 2018, 11:17 am | # | Reply

      We all do our own fair share of goofing up.

      • Sheik
        December 7, 2018, 12:15 pm | # | Reply

        I’m beginning to wonder if getting it right is the exception and not the rule.

  8. K. Iceclaw
    December 7, 2018, 10:33 am | # | Reply

    Hmmmmm. Us there any reason the fuel rods can’t be springshaped?

    • Robert Loughrey
      December 7, 2018, 10:55 am | # | Reply

      Seems like it would even make a nice receptacle for the control rods.

    • Jim Baerg
      December 7, 2018, 12:18 pm | # | Reply

      I’d be surprised if there aren’t springs holding fuel rods in place in at least some reactor designs.

  9. W.
    December 7, 2018, 12:25 pm | # | Reply

    I’m just going to say all giant robots have to be nuclear at the very least. Fusion is preferred. It’s not so much tweaking her theme, but exceeding her original mandate…

  10. Shadowmehr
    December 7, 2018, 8:28 pm | # | Reply

    Heh, fusion source, gears and springs moving the limbs. It’s not really violating her overlying theme as it is expanding it. She just needs to remind herself that there are atomic clocks out there.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

More by Jeff

  • The Scrivnarium

More by Shaenon

  • Horror Every Day
  • Li'l Mell
  • Monster of the Week
  • Narbonic
  • Shaenon.com
Creative Commons License
Skin Horse by Shaenon K. Garrity & Jeffrey C. Wells is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at http://www.skin-horse.com.

©2007-2022 Skin Horse | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑