Well, I could be mistaken, but that uniform doesn’t look like the sort of thing that would be comfortable without having some kind of underwear, so it’s likely that Sergio has on underwear of some sort. Especially since it appears he infiltrated Anasigma long enough ago that he appears to be an actual employee rather than just a dude who took a uniform off another dude, suggesting that everything he has on was planned to suit the situation he expected. (He was clearly not expecting to meet Artie, or to have to execute a rescue.)
This suggests that we’re not likely to see a nude Sergio just yet. Unless, of course, mojo happens, in which case, all bets are off.
Given San Francisco’s general history and reputation, I would have assumed nudity would be likely to be permitted there.
Weirdly, that doesn’t seem to be the case. Apparently public nudity is permitted under state law, but San Francisco itself banned it back in 2012, by a narrow margin (6 votes vs 5 among the Board of Supervisors). Then in 2017, the ban was upheld when challenged. Not sure, but it probably hasn’t been rescinded since.
Also, apparently there were still some exceptions made – young children could go nude, women could still go topless, and events permitted by the city like Pride parades could include nudity.
Weirdest fact I discovered while looking into this – apparently a number of old men in the Castro district who are habitual nudists took to wearing socks on their dongs (and nothing else) in order to meet the minimum level of compliance. Personally, I feel like that’s far, far worse for some reason.
It’s a key part of the plan.
Why?
REASONS!
What are they?
Important. Reasons.
Can you get naked on the San Fran subway? Sure, in New York, but there?
Well, I could be mistaken, but that uniform doesn’t look like the sort of thing that would be comfortable without having some kind of underwear, so it’s likely that Sergio has on underwear of some sort. Especially since it appears he infiltrated Anasigma long enough ago that he appears to be an actual employee rather than just a dude who took a uniform off another dude, suggesting that everything he has on was planned to suit the situation he expected. (He was clearly not expecting to meet Artie, or to have to execute a rescue.)
This suggests that we’re not likely to see a nude Sergio just yet. Unless, of course, mojo happens, in which case, all bets are off.
You say all that as if just seeing Sergio in his underwear wouldn’t be a bit much for Artie at this point.
Given San Francisco’s general history and reputation, I would have assumed nudity would be likely to be permitted there.
Weirdly, that doesn’t seem to be the case. Apparently public nudity is permitted under state law, but San Francisco itself banned it back in 2012, by a narrow margin (6 votes vs 5 among the Board of Supervisors). Then in 2017, the ban was upheld when challenged. Not sure, but it probably hasn’t been rescinded since.
Also, apparently there were still some exceptions made – young children could go nude, women could still go topless, and events permitted by the city like Pride parades could include nudity.
Weirdest fact I discovered while looking into this – apparently a number of old men in the Castro district who are habitual nudists took to wearing socks on their dongs (and nothing else) in order to meet the minimum level of compliance. Personally, I feel like that’s far, far worse for some reason.
Clearly you’ve never ridden BART around Berkley. They even had a student there in the 90’s that attended classes in the nude. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Martinez
I’ve been on both subways, and the answer is yes but for different reasons.
We shall see, won’t we? Butt not on a wet, cold, blustery Bay Breeze day, not Outside.
That’s indoor sport.
Artie is a highly intelligent rodent. He can accomplish multiple goals with a single plan.