Doctor Wilkin’s making progress
As he’s talking to GODOT …
Find the source of his neurosis …
But Sweetheart says they gotta go!
Hear Wilkin give his recommendation
What you can do with your regulations!
Crumple a stack that’s ten feet tall
In a little ball … and shove ’em all …
Where the sun … don’t … shine!
I don’t care … if we’ve run … past our time!
Where the sun … don’t … shine!
(Underground? All ’round)
I was still getting server errors trying to get to comment pages or earlier strips. So I tried using a proxy. That worked so I figured my browser wasn’t behaving. Had to change setting in Firefox plugin RefControl from “block” to “forge”. So your server chokes if it doesn’t see a (minimally) valid referrer header.
I’m not sure I understand. Is she saying that Ruby’s response is not respectful, or is she trying to explain to Ruby that Tip’s response, despite beginning “with respect” is not actually respectful? Or a little of both?
I think she means that, even if Tip’s “suggestion” may not necessarily have the same obscene meaning it’s supposed to, it still isn’t respectful at all.
(TUNE: “Instant Karma!”, John Lennon)
Doctor Wilkin’s making progress
As he’s talking to GODOT …
Find the source of his neurosis …
But Sweetheart says they gotta go!
Hear Wilkin give his recommendation
What you can do with your regulations!
Crumple a stack that’s ten feet tall
In a little ball … and shove ’em all …
Where the sun … don’t … shine!
I don’t care … if we’ve run … past our time!
Where the sun … don’t … shine!
(Underground? All ’round)
Welcome back from outage-land, everyone.
It’s a nice place to visit, I suppose, but you wouldn’t like to live there.
Thanks for the repair. Wednesday and Thursday pages are still inaccessible though.
I was still getting server errors trying to get to comment pages or earlier strips. So I tried using a proxy. That worked so I figured my browser wasn’t behaving. Had to change setting in Firefox plugin RefControl from “block” to “forge”. So your server chokes if it doesn’t see a (minimally) valid referrer header.
I’m not sure I understand. Is she saying that Ruby’s response is not respectful, or is she trying to explain to Ruby that Tip’s response, despite beginning “with respect” is not actually respectful? Or a little of both?
I think she means that, even if Tip’s “suggestion” may not necessarily have the same obscene meaning it’s supposed to, it still isn’t respectful at all.
“Cram the regulations where the sun don’t shine”? Why would they want to stick them in Seattle? ?.?